Verse 20: Now a mediator is not a mediator of
one, but God is one. In other words, there are two parties
required for a mediation. In this case, Moses and the nation of Israel. In
context, I believe that the verse is pointing out the difference between the
giving of the law which required Moses as the mediator and the giving of the
covenant which God mediated on His own with Abraham.
Verse 21: Is the law then against the promises
of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given
life, verily righteousness should have been by the law. The
question is, does the law set aside the promises of God that he gave to Abraham
in the covenant? No. They actually run parallel. One does not trump the other.
However, the law could not give life, for if it could, it would have replaced
the promises, i.e., those made to Abraham 430 years prior.
Verse 22: But the scripture hath concluded all
under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them
that believe. Instead, the scripture, i.e., law, has made it
abundantly clear that all are under sin, both Jew and Gentile. Notice also that
the faith was first that of Christ, and we merely
believe in that faith with our own.
Verse 23: But before faith came, we were kept
under the law, shut up unto the faith which should afterwards be revealed. In
other words, the purpose of the law was to keep the nation shut up unto the
faith which should afterwards be revealed
in and through Christ. The term shut up unto the faith can
also be translated imprisoned or confined. In other words, they were controlled
or under the law until Christ came because his was the faith that made it
possible. Anyone who teaches that everyone has always been saved by grace
through faith is confused because the nation of Israel was incapable of this
kind of faith because it had been shut up unto them until Christ
came.
Verse 24: Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster
to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith. The
law served as the nation's schoolmaster which was given to point them to Christ
so that they might be justified by faith.
This is one of the most misunderstood verses in all of
the Bible, because we fail to recognize that the pronouns our and
we are referring to the nation of Israel and not the Body of
Christ. The Body of Christ has never been kept under the law (cf. verse 23). The
law was given to the nation to bring them to Christ, so that they could be
justified by faith.
Verse 25: But after that faith is come, we are
no longer under a schoolmaster. The faith that was to come was
through Christ, and the law is no longer their schoolmaster. Again, the law
pointed them to Christ. Obviously, the faith was not prior to Christ!
Verses 26-27: For ye are all the children of God
by faith in Christ Jesus. For as many of you as have been baptized into
Christ have put on Christ. Note the change in pronouns, i.e., ye.
He changes from the first-person plural to the second-person plural. Paul is
now referring to the Galatians which were both Jew and Gentile. All of them
must come by faith in Christ and not the law. By their faith, they had been
baptized into Christ and had put on Christ apart from the law. This
baptism has nothing to do with water.
Verse 28: There is neither Jew nor Greek, there
is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one
in Christ Jesus. Under the law there was Jew and Greek, bond and
free, male and female, but not now! How can you not be a dispensationalist
after reading a verse like this!?
No comments:
Post a Comment
I do appreciate any observations or questions you may have.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.